Joker
Joker back-story: No one knows. The Joker’s true identity remains a
mystery and with that his story is unknown. I think that’s part of the reason
that he is so much scarier than the others, with out a back-story, he becomes
almost soulless and inhumane.
The Telegraph talks about The Joker in Dark Knight and how he may have made the movie unfit for the eyes of children. Check it out here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/2461820/Our-attitude-to-violence-is-beyond-a-joke-as-new-Batman-film-The-Dark-Knight-shows.html
The author writes, "[the film has a] sustained level of intensely sadistic brutality throughout the film." Please go on, Telegraph author. You wouldn't take your child to see this? Explain. Because "A man's face is filleted by a knife, and another's is burned half off. A man's eye is slammed into a pencil. A bomb can be seen crudely stitched inside another man's stomach, which subsequently explodes. A trussed-up man is bound to a chair and set alight atop a pile of banknotes." I understand. It is pretty gruesome. Oh but what was that last part? You said "[Christopher Nolan] has tried instead to make the violence and fear as believable as possible, and in this he has succeeded." DING DING DING. So is the movie so violent and unbelievable that you wouldn't want your child to see? Or is the movie violent and too realistic for your child to see because you want him/her to live a sheltered life and not know how bad the world can be? Violent or realistic? I know my answer. What's yours?